New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "I was so fortunate and privileged to have Mr. Goldstein in my corner. You will find none better." by Stephen Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More

IMPEACHING YOUR OWN WITNESS

WHO MAY IMPEACH [FED. R. EVID. RULE 607]

The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling him, US v. Hagenstab, 575 F.2d 1035 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 US 827 (1978); US v. Craig, 573 F.2d 513 (7th Cir. 1978); however, counsel may not lead his own witness. FED. R. EVID. Rule 611(c).

State “Voucher Rule” denied Defendant his Sixth Amendment right of compulsory process and right to cross-examine one’s own witness. Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 US 284 (1973) (holding defense counsel entitled to cross-examine witness regarding statements against interest even though hearsay and even though, in fact, impeaching witness was called by defense).

However, the prosecutor may not use a witness’ prior inconsistent statement for the primary purpose of getting otherwise inadmissible evidence before the jury. US v. Miller, 664 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied. 459 US 854 (1982) (emphasis added).

In US v. Hogan, 771 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1985), during a prosecution for conspiracy to import marijuana, the Government had called a witness for the “primary purpose” of impeaching him with inadmissible hearsay evidence. The Fifth Circuit refused to reverse the conviction on this ground because (1) no part of the witness’ testimony was applicable to the importation charge, which related to a prior, successful smuggling operation, and (2) the witness made no reference to that prior operation.

LEADING YOUR OWN WITNESS

LEADING QUESTIONS [FED. R. EVID. RULE 611(c)]

Rule 611(c) restricts “leading questions” to cross-examination unless “necessary to develop” the witness’ testimony, “a hostile witness, and adverse party, or witness identified with an adverse party.”

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact