New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "They're the best, very thorough." by Doug T. Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More

Pretrial Motions: Table of Contents

View Full Document

Part IV: Pretrial Motions

  • TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
  • NOTICE OF ALIBI……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
  • NOTICE OF INSANITY OR MENTAL DEFECT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
  • AMENDMENTS TO RULE FED. CRIM. P. 12.2……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
    • Notice of Defense of Governmental Authority:……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
  • CONTINUANCE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3
  • DISCOVERY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4
  • DISCLOSURE BY THE GOVERNMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
    • DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
    • WRITINGS OR TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE DEFENDANT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
    • SPONTANEOUS ADMISSIONS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
    • DEFENDANT’S ORAL STATEMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
    • STATEMENTS BY DEFENDANT WHICH GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO USE AT TRIAL………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
    • ORAL STATEMENTS DIFFER FROM WRITTEN……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
    • SUMMARIES OF INTERVIEWS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
    • AGENT’S ROUGH NOTES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
    • “SILENCE” MAY CONSTITUTE A DISCOVERABLE “STATEMENT”……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
    • DEFENDANT’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
    • CORPORATE OFFICERS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
    • PRODUCTION OF DEFENDANT’S STATEMENTS AT “DETENTION HEARING”……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
    • DEFENDANT’S CRIMINAL RECORD………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
    • GOVERNMENT WITNESSES’ CRIMINAL RECORDS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
    • DOCUMENTS AND TANGIBLE OBJECTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
    • REQUISITE SHOWING………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
    • TEXTS AND EXAMINATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13
    • EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY, OPINION, BASIS, AND QUALIFICATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13
    • GOVERNMENT WITNESSES’ NAMES AND ADDRESSES………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13
    • IDENTITY OF INFORMANTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15
    • NO PRIVILEGE WHERE IDENTITY KNOWN………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17
    • RIGHT TO INTERVIEW KNOWN GOVERNMENT WITNESSES………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19
    • USE OF INFORMANTS AND DUE PROCESS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20
    • CO-CONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20
    • PRESENTENCE REPORTS OF CO-DEFENDANTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21
    • GRAND JURY MINUTES………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22
    • JENCKS ACT WITNESS STATEMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25
      • PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE NO LONGER PROHIBITED………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25
      • AT VERY LEAST CONTINUANCE MAY BE REQUIRED………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27
      • OR AN IN CAMERA HEARING………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
      • JENCK’S ACT STATEMENT LIMITATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
  • RECIPROCAL DISCLOSURE [THE “TWO-WAY” STREET]………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
    • COUNSEL SHOULD BE MINDFUL THAT DEFENSE WITNESSES’ STATEMENTS MAY BE DISCOVERABLE BY PROSECUTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29
    • CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REQUIRING AN ACCUSED TO MAKE DISCLOSURE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 30
    • AGENT’S ROUGH NOTES………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 30
    • BUT IF THEY’RE ROUGH ENOUGH………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32
  • REPORTS OF EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32
    • Scientific Tests and Reports 32
    • Field Tests 33
    • Failure to Produce 33
    • DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT REPORTS AT PRE-TRIAL SUPPRESSION HEARING………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33
  • DISCOVERY FROM GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MANUALS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34
  • DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENDANT (RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY)………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 35
    • TRIGGERING RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36
    • MATERIALITY OF GOVERNMENT REQUEST………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36
    • INFORMATION NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36
      • Work Product……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36
      • Witness Statements……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37
  • GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 37
    • DEFENDANT’S TESTIMONY………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37
    • CORPORATE DEFENDANT………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37
    • GRAND JURY WITNESSS TESTIMONY………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37
    • RULE 6(e) DISCOVERY………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38
    • PARTICULARIZED NEED………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38
  • CONTINUING DUTY TO DISCLOSE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38
    • Application of Duty 38
    • Failure to Disclose 39
  • GOVERNMENT MAY DEPOSE DEFENSE COUNSEL IN PURSUIT OF CLIENT’S FORFEITED ASSETS………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 39
    • SANCTIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39
  • BRADY MOTION (EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 40
    • TEST………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 40
    • FAVORABLE EVIDENCE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 40
    • IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41
    • SPECIFIC REQUEST REQUIRED………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41
    • “IMPEACHMENT” “EXCULPATORY” EVIDENCE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42
    • PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 43
    • NON-GOVERMENTAL AGENCIES………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44
    • CO-DEFENDANT’S EXCULPATORY STATEMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44
    • EVIDENCE IMPEACHING GOVERNMENT WITNESS’ TESTIMONY………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44
    • CRIMINAL RECORD OF GOVERNMENT WITNESS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45
    • COMPLAINING GOVERNMENT WITNESS’ BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45
    • GOVERNMENT WITNESS’ PERSONNEL FILE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45
    • EVIDENCE UNDERMINING CONFIDENCE CRIME OCCURRED………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45
    • EVIDENCE UNDERMINING CONFIDENCE THAT DEFENDANT WAS PERPETRATOR
    • …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 45
    • OR RAISING A DEFENSE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46
    • TRANSCRIPTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46
    • PROTECTIVE ORDERS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46
  • IN CAMERA INSPECTIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46
    • Predicate for Request…………………………………………………………………………… 46
    • Cases Requiring ………………………………………………………………….. 47
    • Cases Not Requiring ……………………………………………………………. 47
  • PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION……………………………………………………….. 47
  • PRETRIAL CONFERENCE…………………………………………………………………. 50
  • DEPOSITION…………………………………………………………………………………….. 52
  • PRODUCTION OF BOOKS, PAPERS, DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTS…….. 53
  • DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC SURVEILANCE……………………………….. 54
  • TITLE III OF OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL AND SAFE STREETS ACT OF 1968……………………………………………………………………………………………… 56
  • SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE…………………………………………………………… 56
    • STANDARD FOR REVIEW………………………………………………………………… 57
    • PRESERVATION OF ERROR……………………………………………………………… 57
    • APPEAL…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 58
  • BILL OF PARTICULARS R. CRIM. P. Rule 7(f)………………………….. 58
  • OTHER DISCOVERY…………………………………………………………………………. 63
  • SEVERANCE…………………………………………………………………………………….. 63
(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact