New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "I'm very impressed how Mrs. Orr handled everything, she is very professional and I recommend Mrs. Orr if your in need an attorney for a white collar case!!!" by Anonymous Former Client Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "I was so fortunate and privileged to have Mr. Goldstein in my corner. You will find none better." by Stephen Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

While “the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to commercial premises, as well as to private homes…”, it has been recognized that “[A]n expectation of privacy in commercial premises, however, is different from, and indeed less than, a similar expectation in an individual’s home”. New York v. Burger,107 S.Ct. 2636, 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987).

Moreover, in contrast to the private home-owners Fourth Amendment rights, the owner of commercial property has no expectation of privacy beyond the interior of its covered buildings (there apparently is no “curtilage” recognized with respect to commercial property).

“The intimate activities associated with family privacy and the home and its curtilage simply do not reach the outdoor areas or spaces between structures and buildings of a manufacturing plant.” Dow Chemical Co. v. U.S., 476 U.S. at 236 [upholding EPA’s aerial surveillance].

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact